/lq_crispr_scd_003
Evolvingv8·72% confidence Public

What is the long-term efficacy and safety profile of CRISPR-based gene therapy for sickle cell disease beyond 2 years?

Origin: "FDA approval of Casgevy prompted long-term monitoring query"

Subscribers

5,623

Contributors

892

Oracle Tier

Weekly

Next Rerun

2026-04-20

Epistemic Status: Evolving

Was one status, shifting. New evidence changing the picture.

Revenue & Distribution

Revenue Generated

$89,000

Distributed to Contributors

$35,600

40% distributed · Tracked via Proven.dev provenance chain

Current Findings

Papers
112
Patients
892
Confidence
72%

Key Papers (2)

Exagamglogene Autotemcel for Sickle Cell Disease (CLIMB-SCD-121)

NEJM · 2024 · Cited in evidence chain

Long-Term Follow-Up of CRISPR Gene Therapy: 2-Year Outcomes

Blood · 2026 · Cited in evidence chain

Candidate Questions from Blast Radius

Do anti-Cas9 antibodies reduce therapy durability beyond 3 years?

Investigate
Confidence: 65%Decay: 3.0%/mo

Can reduced-intensity conditioning replace busulfan for CRISPR SCD therapy?

Investigate
Confidence: 71%Decay: 2.0%/mo

A question rejected today is not a bad question. It might be a premature question. Like continental drift. Like H. pylori. The system remembers what it was curious about.

Oracle Schedule

TierTier 2 — Weekly
Last Rerun2026-03-20
Next Rerun2026-04-20
Created2025-01-10

Epistemic Status Scale

Validated
Reported
Evolving
Disputed
Insufficient
Blocked (Honest)

Help Answer This Question

Your data, expertise, or funding can help move this query from Evolving to the next level.

View Campaign →